By Chason ArthurRevision 145.021Published Updated

API security / PostgreSQL RLS / Identity

Compare the choices.

Choose a pattern by the failure it addresses. Several safeguards can be necessary at once.

Which approach fits the problem?

Patterns and tradeoffs
ApproachUseful whenDecision or limitation
UI visibilityMake the available actions understandableNot an authorization boundary
Handler policyValidate identity, membership and actionEvery entry point must invoke it
Database row policyRestrict rows under a restricted application roleOwners, privileged roles and connection context need care
Role-based permissionsA small stable set of responsibilitiesCan become coarse as rules depend on resources
Attribute-based policyRules depend on ownership or resource stateRequires explicit inputs and understandable audit reasons
Opaque server sessionA local application owns session stateNeeds lifecycle, transport and revocation controls

Which environment should you use?

Execution environments
EnvironmentWhat you can doScope
This browser labClick, compare, reset and inspect exact sourceInvented sessions feed actual PostgreSQL row policies in your browser. The download adds a local HTTP adapter with opaque fixture sessions. Neither version is a production identity provider or a test of every database-privilege configuration.
Independent downloadRun the same prebuilt lab with Python’s local serverNo package installation or automatic external calls needed for the prebuilt preview
Native exerciseRun language tests and the included local adapter or scriptRequires the documented local toolchain; does not provision a cloud service

A comparison you can reproduce

The safe cross-company read returns 404 with no foreign rows. A viewer’s edit returns 403; an expired session returns 401. A list query without a tenant filter still returns only Orchard’s row under RLS.

What this adds to a conventional tutorial

Begin with an observable outcome, inspect the decisions that produced it, then test a repair. The companion tutorial explains the mechanism; the how-to guide takes the same source into an independent environment.

Read the primary documentation

Mux’s full-stack opening includes identity and account-management product features.

Related role from the job review

Choose your next step

Build the safeguards

Eight explained steps, a source example and a checkpoint at each decision.

Read the tutorial

Compare the alternatives

Understand where each pattern helps and which tradeoffs remain.

Compare approaches

Run and extend it locally

Download the independent environment, run the native checks and try a specific extension.

Open the how-to guide

Lab discussion / Tenant Boundary Lab

What would you try next?

Ask about the code, compare an approach, or describe an edge case. Reader comments are reviewed before publication.

All lab discussions

Reader comments

Open the discussion to read and add reader comments.

Read or write a comment →

Code walkthrough

Follow the implementation in code.

These short excerpts connect the lab’s behavior to its implementation. Each example links to the full tutorial step for its context, tradeoffs and checkpoint. Names and dependencies belong to that source; the excerpts are not standalone programs.

Example 01 · Tutorial excerpt

Validate the session lifecycle

The expired preset uses an already expired session. The safe policy checks the expiry before querying data. Production identity also needs a trusted issuer or session store, secure transport and revocation rules. Decoding an unverified token or accepting a browser role field would not establish identity.

if (!session || session.expires <= now) return {status: 401};

Read the full tutorial step

Example 02 · Tutorial excerpt

Authorize the action as well as the account

A viewer may read but not edit. Membership and action checks are separate: being in the right company does not make every action permissible. Deny an unsupported action before changing data, and test that the denial leaves the record unchanged.

if (action === "update" && session.role !== "editor") {
 return {allowed: false, status: 403};
}

Read the full tutorial step

Example 03 · Tutorial excerpt

Use a restricted database role

RLS is ineffective if the application routinely uses a bypassing role. The exercise explicitly changes from the owner to a restricted role before running the query. Policies, grants and owner behavior are different mechanisms. Test the exact role used by the application, including administrative paths.

CREATE ROLE lab_reader NOLOGIN NOSUPERUSER NOBYPASSRLS;
SET ROLE lab_reader;

Read the full tutorial step

Example 04 · Tutorial excerpt

Apply the row policy

The USING expression controls visible rows; WITH CHECK constrains new row values on supported writes. The example uses a session-derived company setting. The omitted-filter preset is important: a WHERE clause in one handler is not the only boundary the application should rely on.

USING (tenant_id = current_setting('app.tenant',true))
WITH CHECK (tenant_id = current_setting('app.tenant',true))

Read the full tutorial step

Example 05 · Tutorial excerpt

Scope connection state to the transaction

A real connection can be reused. The native adapter uses SET LOCAL ROLE and transaction-local set_config so the context expires when the transaction ends. It also serializes access to this single embedded connection. A production pool needs tests for concurrency, rollback and connection reuse.

SELECT set_config('app.tenant',$1,true);

Read the full tutorial step